Lummis Defends CLARITY Act as DeFi Developers Face KYC Concerns

The post Lummis Defends CLARITY Act as DeFi Developers Face KYC Concerns appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

U.S. Senator Cynthia Lummis said the CLARITY Act will deliver the strongest protections yet for DeFi developers, pushing back against concerns that the bill could expose them to legal risk. She noted recent bipartisan updates to Title 3 aim to fix those issues.

Although the updated draft is not yet public, she maintains that its passage is essential to secure these protections. She urged support for the bill, pushing back against claims by analyst Jake Chervinsky that the draft could still impose KYC rules on non-custodial developers.

Title 3 Raises Red Flags

While Chervinsky cheered Lummis’ support for the Clarity Act, he showed his concern, pointing to risks within Title 3, which focuses on illicit finance provisions, practically calling it “non-negotiable for DeFi”. He argues the wording could still lead to non-custodial developers being treated as money transmitters, even if they do not handle user funds.

Such a classification could impose compliance requirements like KYC, something Chervinsky says would be damaging for DeFi. He stressed that ensuring developers are not miscategorized remains a critical issue.

Tension With Existing Framework

Mostly, the discussions are around how these provisions align with the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA), introduced by Lummis and Senator Ron Wyden. The BRCA is designed to clarify that developers and infrastructure providers should not fall under financial institution rules if they lack control over assets. 

“The biggest challenge is ensuring non-custodial software developers aren’t misclassified as money transmitters.” Chervinsky 

Earlier drafts included these protections alongside self-custody provisions. However, the addition of new language has raised concerns that these safeguards may not hold up in practice, creating uncertainty for developers.

.article-inside-link {
margin-left: 0 !important;
border: 1px solid #0052CC4D;
border-left: 0;
border-right: 0;
padding: 10px 0;
text-align: left;
}

.entry ul.article-inside-link li {
font-size: 14px;
line-height: 21px;
font-weight: 600;
list-style-type: none;
margin-bottom: 0;
display: inline-block;
}

.entry ul.article-inside-link li:last-child {
display: none;
}

• Also Read :
•   Top 2 Altcoins Institutions Are Buying Before the Clarity Act
•   ,

The issue has gained urgency following recent legal actions in the U.S., including the 2025 conviction of Roman Storm. The case highlighted how developers can face liability tied to how their software is used, intensifying calls for clearer boundaries.

Bill Still Being Negotiated

The CLARITY Act remains under review as lawmakers continue discussions. A planned Senate Banking Committee markup was postponed to allow more negotiation.

At the same time, disagreements over stablecoin provisions, particularly those affecting bank deposits, have added another layer to the debate. With multiple points still unsettled, the final version of the bill is yet to take shape.

FAQs